Behavioral FinanceTrading PsychologyMarket Microstructure

Individual Investors Lose 3.8 Percentage Points Annually to Active Trading

Summary by Robert Gorak · Published June 11, 2026 · Last reviewed June 11, 2026

Brad M. Barber and Yi-Tsung Lee and Yu-Jane Liu and Terrance Odean·2009·Review of Financial Studies
Sample: approximately 3.9 million individual investors, 24,000 corporations, 83 dealers, 1,600 foreigners, and 289 mutual fundsData: Taiwan Stock Exchange complete transaction historyPeriod: 1995–1999

Individual Investors Lose 3.8 Percentage Points Annually to Active Trading


Active retail trading imposes systematic, economically large costs on individual investors. Turnover on the Taiwan Stock Exchange averaged nearly 300% annually—two to three times U.S. rates during the same period. Barber, Lee, Liu, and Odean (2009), in "Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading?", studied 3.9 million investors from 1995 to 1999. The aggregate individual investor portfolio lost 3.8 percentage points in annual return; total losses of $NT 935 billion equaled 2.2% of Taiwan's GDP.

What the Study Found

Individual investors lost $NT 35.3 million daily at a one-day horizon and $NT 178.7 million daily at a 140-day horizon. Of all trades, 64% emanated from aggressive orders, and virtually all individual investor losses traced to those aggressive trades. Passive individual trades generated short-run profits that eroded to zero by 25 to 140 trading days. Institutions earned annual abnormal returns of 1.5 percentage points after commissions and transaction taxes. Foreign institutions captured 46.2% of total institutional trading and market-timing gross profits at a six-month horizon.

Methodology

The dataset is the complete Taiwan Stock Exchange transaction history from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 1999. The sample included approximately 3.9 million individual investors, 24,000 corporations, 83 dealers, 1,600 foreigners, and 289 mutual funds. Dollar profits used calendar-time portfolios mimicking net daily purchases and sales at holding periods of 1, 10, 25, and 140 trading days. Abnormal returns were estimated with a four-factor model controlling for market, size (SMB), value (HML), and momentum (WML).

Key Statistics

Metric Finding Context
Annual return penalty for individual investors 3.8 percentage points Aggregate individual portfolio, Taiwan Stock Exchange 1995–1999
Total individual investor losses $NT 935 billion ($US 32 billion) Taiwan Stock Exchange, 1995–1999
Annual individual investor losses $NT 187 billion ($US 6.4 billion) Average per year, Taiwan Stock Exchange 1995–1999
Losses as % of Taiwan GDP 2.2% Five-year total 1995–1999
Losses as % of total personal income 2.8% Five-year total 1995–1999
Loss breakdown: trading losses 27% of total Taiwan Stock Exchange 1995–1999
Loss breakdown: commissions 32% of total Taiwan Stock Exchange 1995–1999
Loss breakdown: transaction taxes 34% of total Taiwan Stock Exchange 1995–1999
Loss breakdown: market-timing losses 7% of total Taiwan Stock Exchange 1995–1999
Annual institutional gain (after transaction costs) 1.5 percentage points Aggregate institutional portfolio, Taiwan Stock Exchange 1995–1999
Foreign institutions' share of institutional profits 46.2% Trading and market-timing gross profits, six-month horizon
Mean daily individual losses (140-day horizon) $NT 178.7 million t = −4.68; Taiwan Stock Exchange 1995–1999
Share of trades from aggressive orders 64% All trades, Taiwan Stock Exchange 1995–1999
TSE annual turnover approximately 300% Average 1995–1999
Day trading as % of total trading volume 23% By dollar value, Taiwan Stock Exchange 1995–1999
Four-factor model Rt − Rft = α + β(Rmt − Rft) + s·SMBt + h·HMLt + w·WMLt Monthly abnormal return estimation for each investor group (Equation 1)
Cumulative Abnormal Return CART = Σ(MAbuy_τ − MAsell_τ) Event-time return on stocks bought less stocks sold (Equation 2)

Why This Matters

Countries relying on personal investment accounts for retirement savings expose citizens to the costs of uninformed active trading. Taiwan equity mutual funds earned positive net returns despite annual expense ratios of 2.4% to 3.1%. Fewer than 1% of household equity was held in funds during the sample period, suggesting most investors did not take the lower-cost alternative. The lottery experiment implies that some retail trading serves a gambling motive, complicating purely educational responses to overtrading.

Frequently Asked Questions

3.8 percentage points per year was the annual return penalty for individual investors from 1995 to 1999. Total losses reached $NT 935 billion ($US 32 billion) over five years. The breakdown: 27% trading losses, 32% commissions, 34% transaction taxes, and 7% market-timing losses.

$NT 178.7 million was the mean daily loss at a 140-day horizon, and virtually all of it traced to aggressive orders. Passive individual trades earned short-run profits that eroded to zero by 25 to 140 trading days. Institutions earned reliably positive profits from both passive and aggressive trades at all horizons.

46.2% of all institutional trading and market-timing gross profits went to foreign investors at a six-month horizon. At shorter horizons, foreigners earned roughly one-fourth of institutional profits. Net of transaction costs, foreign investors averaged $NT 75.5 million in daily profits. Dealers averaged $NT 5.0 million and mutual funds $NT 48.4 million.

One-fourth is the estimated reduction in TSE monthly turnover after legalized gambling was introduced (β5 = −5.62, t = −3.69). Monthly TSE turnover averaged 22.6% before the lottery introduction. Annual net lottery losses averaged about $NT 32.9 billion, versus the estimated $NT 46.75 billion annual reduction in trading losses from lower activity.

Source

Brad M. Barber and Yi-Tsung Lee and Yu-Jane Liu and Terrance Odean (2009). Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading?. Review of Financial Studies.

Read the full paper