Risk Management

The Black-Scholes Formula: Pricing Options with Five Observable Inputs

Summary by Robert Gorak · Published June 10, 2026 · Last reviewed June 10, 2026

Fischer Black and Myron Scholes·1973·Journal of Political Economy
Data: Call-option data (Black and Scholes 1972)

The Black-Scholes model is a closed-form formula for pricing European options from 5 observable inputs. Black and Scholes (1973) derived it in "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 637–654. The formula w(x,t) = xN(d₁) - ce^(r(t*-t))N(d₂) excludes the expected return on the stock as an input. Empirical tests on a large body of call-option data showed option buyers consistently pay prices above the formula's predictions.

What the Study Found

Black and Scholes showed the formula requires exactly 5 inputs: stock price, exercise price, risk-free rate, variance rate, and time to expiration. The expected return on the stock does not appear in equation (13). The option delta, w₁(x,t) = N(d₁), gives the hedge ratio for maintaining a riskless position. The elasticity xw₁/w is always greater than 1, making the option always more volatile than the underlying stock. The gap between option buyer prices and formula values is larger for low-risk stocks than for high-risk stocks.

Methodology

The derivation assumes 7 ideal market conditions, including constant risk-free rate, log-normal stock prices, no dividends, and no transaction costs. A hedged portfolio of 1 share long and 1/w₁ options short has a return independent of the stock price. Setting that return equal to the risk-free rate yields w₂ = rw - rxw₁ - ½v²x²w₁₁. The unique solution satisfying w(x,t*) = max(x - c, 0) is equation (13).

Key Statistics

Metric Finding Context
Call option formula w(x,t) = xN(d₁) - ce^(r(t*-t))N(d₂) Prices a European call from 5 observable inputs
Valuation PDE w₂ = rw - rxw₁ - ½v²x²w₁₁ No-arbitrage condition on the continuously adjusted hedged position
Option delta w₁(x,t) = N(d₁) Hedge ratio; shares of stock per short option to maintain a riskless position
Option beta β_w = (xw₁/w) × β_x Option beta equals stock beta multiplied by the price elasticity
Put-call parity w(x,t) - u(x,t) = x - ce^(r(t-t*)) Relation between European call and put on the same stock and exercise price
Put option formula u(x,t) = -xN(-d₁) + ce^(-rt*)N(-d₂) European put value derived from put-call parity
Option vs. stock volatility xw₁/w always greater than 1 Option is always more volatile than the underlying stock
Empirical deviation Option buyers pay consistently above formula predictions Gap is larger for low-risk stocks than for high-risk stocks

Why This Matters

The formula extends to all corporate liabilities viewable as options on a firm's assets. Stockholders hold a call option to buy the firm from bondholders for the face value of debt. Black and Scholes showed that increasing debt raises the probability of default and reduces the market value of bonds. The same framework prices warrants by adjusting the exercise price for the firm's post-exercise equity structure.

Frequently Asked Questions

5 inputs: stock price, exercise price, risk-free rate, variance rate, and time to expiration. The expected return on the stock is not an input. Black and Scholes (1973) stated in equation (13) on p. 644 that option value is independent of the expected return.

Black and Scholes (1973) showed on p. 644 that option value is independent of the expected return on the stock. No-arbitrage on the continuously adjusted hedged portfolio forces its return to equal the risk-free rate. The partial differential equation (7) contains only the risk-free rate r and variance v² — no expected-return term.

Black and Scholes used a 10-year pure discount bond to show equity value equals w(x,t) and bond value equals x - w(x,t). Increasing the face value of debt c raises the probability of default and reduces bond market value below face value. Stockholders hold an option to buy the firm from bondholders at the debt's face value.

Black and Scholes (1972) tested a large body of call-option data and found option buyers consistently pay above formula predictions. Writers receive prices at approximately the formula level. The gap is larger for low-risk stocks than high-risk stocks; Black and Scholes (1973) stated the market appears to underestimate variance-rate differences.

Source

Fischer Black and Myron Scholes (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy.

Read the full paper